Comments on: Scanning Spawn with the NextEngine 3D Scanner http://3d-printer.org/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner Best Web Information on 3D Printers Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:54:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: ameriann1 http://3d-printer.org/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner/comment-page-1#comment-333 ameriann1 Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:44:03 +0000 http://3d-printer.org/3d-scanner/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner#comment-333 <b>Can you please tell ...</b> <br> Can you please tell me how the scan thing makes simple toy into a model then into a CGI program please hun? Can you please tell …
Can you please tell me how the scan thing makes simple toy into a model then into a CGI program please hun?

]]> By: tailsdahedgehog http://3d-printer.org/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner/comment-page-1#comment-334 tailsdahedgehog Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:44:03 +0000 http://3d-printer.org/3d-scanner/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner#comment-334 <b>Dude, you must be ...</b> <br> Dude, you must be rich. Dude, you must be …
Dude, you must be rich.

]]> By: dameandrake http://3d-printer.org/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner/comment-page-1#comment-335 dameandrake Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:44:03 +0000 http://3d-printer.org/3d-scanner/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner#comment-335 <b>AWESOME!!!</b> <br> AWESOME!!! AWESOME!!!
AWESOME!!!

]]> By: CarlosJader http://3d-printer.org/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner/comment-page-1#comment-336 CarlosJader Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:44:03 +0000 http://3d-printer.org/3d-scanner/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner#comment-336 <b>perfect scan and ...</b> <br> perfect scan and nice animation im testing david but even when i try to scan a simple surface i get a wavy shape idk what im doing wrong perfect scan and …
perfect scan and nice animation
im testing david but even when i try to scan a simple surface i get a wavy shape
idk what im doing wrong

]]> By: buffLaser2000 http://3d-printer.org/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner/comment-page-1#comment-337 buffLaser2000 Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:44:03 +0000 http://3d-printer.org/3d-scanner/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner#comment-337 <b>The textures are ...</b> <br> The textures are automatically preserved when you simplify (decimate) inside ScanStudio. The textures are …
The textures are automatically preserved when you simplify (decimate) inside ScanStudio.

]]> By: StudioFlipmcgee http://3d-printer.org/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner/comment-page-1#comment-338 StudioFlipmcgee Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:44:03 +0000 http://3d-printer.org/3d-scanner/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner#comment-338 <b>If you decimate, ...</b> <br> If you decimate, how would one transfer the scanned texture of the original into the lo poly version? If you decimate, …
If you decimate, how would one transfer the scanned texture of the original into the lo poly version?

]]> By: 3DScanNerd http://3d-printer.org/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner/comment-page-1#comment-339 3DScanNerd Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:44:03 +0000 http://3d-printer.org/3d-scanner/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner#comment-339 <b>So the work-flow ...</b> <br> So the work-flow becomes quite simple; Scan your object, decimate the mesh as per your needs, export the mesh to TopoGun for retopologizing in the areas of interest and then export to 3DS or your choice of Animation/Rending software. Let me know if you have any further questions. Cheers, Nick So the work-flow …
So the work-flow becomes quite simple; Scan your object, decimate the mesh as per your needs, export the mesh to TopoGun for retopologizing in the areas of interest and then export to 3DS or your choice of Animation/Rending software.

Let me know if you have any further questions.

Cheers,
Nick

]]> By: 3DScanNerd http://3d-printer.org/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner/comment-page-1#comment-340 3DScanNerd Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:44:03 +0000 http://3d-printer.org/3d-scanner/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner#comment-340 <b>In most cases you ...</b> <br> In most cases you want control of creating this "organized" mesh based upon your animation needs. A wonderful tool for doing this is called TopoGun, which allows you to re-topologize mesh files with great control for animation purposes. In most cases you …
In most cases you want control of creating this “organized” mesh based upon your animation needs. A wonderful tool for doing this is called TopoGun, which allows you to re-topologize mesh files with great control for animation purposes.

]]> By: 3DScanNerd http://3d-printer.org/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner/comment-page-1#comment-341 3DScanNerd Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:44:03 +0000 http://3d-printer.org/3d-scanner/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner#comment-341 <b>I understand your ...</b> <br> I understand your concerns with mesh of the shell scan, its extremely dense but can easily be decimated to a lower poly count using the scanner and provided software. You referred to edge-loop based mesh and I ume you mean how the polys are split along the surface of the mesh and that they should follow the natural curvature of the object for natural flowing animation. I understand your …
I understand your concerns with mesh of the shell scan, its extremely dense but can easily be decimated to a lower poly count using the scanner and provided software. You referred to edge-loop based mesh and I ume you mean how the polys are split along the surface of the mesh and that they should follow the natural curvature of the object for natural flowing animation.

]]> By: krononomikon http://3d-printer.org/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner/comment-page-1#comment-342 krononomikon Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:44:03 +0000 http://3d-printer.org/3d-scanner/scanning-spawn-with-the-nextengine-3d-scanner#comment-342 <b>I'm not sure, ...</b> <br> I'm not sure, because I don't use it... however, I would suggest taking the lowest-res model you can next to a high-res and making a normal map. That way, you can at least have the geometry simpler, if not fixing it yourself I’m not sure, …
I’m not sure, because I don’t use it… however, I would suggest taking the lowest-res model you can next to a high-res and making a normal map. That way, you can at least have the geometry simpler, if not fixing it yourself

]]>